Policy ModelHealthcare Policy and AnalysisAssignmentDue December 19

  

Policy Model

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

Assignment

Due December 19

Policy Model

Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind. 

For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward. 

Resources


Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources


Readings

·
Dawes, D. E. (2020). 
The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.

·
Chapter 4, “How the Game is Played: Successful Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp.78–111)

·
Porche, Demetrius J. (2023).
 Health policy: Applications for nurses and other health professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

·
Chapter 9, “Policy Formulation and Implementation” (pp.101-112)

·
Chapter 10, “Policy Analysis” (pp.113-140)


Media


The following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S.


Please select at least two from the following to view.

·
CNBC. (2018, December 26). 


Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensiveLinks to an external site.


 [Video].
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

·
FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18). 


The healthcare divide Links to an external site.




(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site.


 [Video].
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.

·
IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6). 


The U.S. health care system is terminally brokenLinks to an external site.

 [Video].
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.

·
PBS NewsHour. (2021). 


Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site.



. 
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.

To Prepare

·
Review the twelve policy models outlined in 
Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals (Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)

·
Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2. 

·
You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.

The Assignment: (2 pages)

Submit a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda. 

In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process. 

Support your response with evidence. 

 

Rubric

NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions