INSTRUCTION :TCAP #5: Reflection on Professional Feedback & #6: Professional Development and Ethical Leadership

INSTRUCTION :

TCAP #5: Reflection on Professional Feedback & #6: Professional Development and Ethical Leadership Plan

This assessment is specifically designed to further your reflexive praxis on the impact your coursework is having on your professional practice; and to help you establish measurable learning and professional development goals for your future growth as a teacher. In addition, you will begin to anchor your self-examination within the language of the professional teaching standards

·

InTASC Model Core Teaching StandardsLinks to an external site.

·

Approved Teacher Practice Rubrics for New York StateLinks to an external site.

·

Council for Exceptional ChildrenLinks to an external site.
 

·

The New York State Teaching StandardsLinks to an external site.

·

Culturally Responsive Sustaining Education Framework

Download Culturally Responsive Sustaining Education Framework

The assessment, along with others, is designed to help you to more fully and coherently articulate your professional practice, as related to the Touro University’s Candidate Learning Outcomes (CLOs). 

Candidate Learning Outcomes.docx


 Download Candidate Learning Outcomes.docx
 

This
 8-10-page paper has two parts: 
Looking Backward: Reflexive Praxis and 
Planning Forward: Goal Setting. Support your arguments with references to relevant educational literature that may include course texts.

Looking Backward: Reflexive Praxis

Examine your prior experiences during coursework and their impact on your professional practice (in your classroom(s)). Consider the grade/functional levels and the content/disciplines for which you designed and implemented instruction. Consider the learning outcomes that resulted, the challenges you faced, and your core beliefs about teaching and learning (Revisit Philosophy Statement from EDSN600 course). Afterwards, address the following questions:

· Name and describe the impact(s) you have had on students’ learning or growth as a result of coursework and student teaching.

· Discuss ways in which you have used feedback from your teacher education program (i.e. instructors/supervisors; cooperating teachers) to improve your practice.

· Identify a minimum of three Candidate Learning Outcomes that you view as your strongest attributes and discuss why. Identify the specific standards and corresponding elements by name and provide examples of how they will show up in your practice.

· Reflect on your coursework and program of study. Discuss any areas of concern you might have regarding the development of your ability to meet the needs of diverse learners and explain why.

Planning Forward: Goal Setting

For this section you will construct two to three (2-3) professional goals, anchored by your Looking Backwards: Reflexive Praxis exercise. Your goals should address areas of growth that you wish to develop as a result. Each goal should be measurable with a clear outcome (e.g., To move from a primarily lecture style of course instruction to the use of interactive learning in mathematics; To establish ongoing communication with parents/guardians for an 80% homework completion rate in my class; Strengthen my classroom management skills for a decrease in time off task during whole group instruction).

Once you have established clear, measurable goals, enumerate each:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Next, explain how each goal is aligned with a particular Candidate Learning Outcomes.

Lastly, establish three to five (3-5) strategies that you will take to fulfill each goal (e.g., Collaboratively design my first two mathematics lessons with Ms. Jones who uses experiential exercises; Construct a take-home instructional guide for each unit that include family activities, reinforcing key unit concepts; Attend the fall Classroom Learning Environment workshop that many student teachers have recommended for better understanding the use of emotional intelligence in the classroom).

You will upload your assignment via the learning management system (CANVAS). Your assignment will be reviewed for its thoroughness of the components listed above, evenly across each: Looking Backwards: Reflexive Praxis; Planning Forward: Goal Setting (e.g., established goals, alignment with the appropriate Candidate Learning Outcomes, and strategies).

Grading Rubric: Looking Backward/Looking Forward (1)

Grading Rubric: Looking Backward/Looking Forward (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsights into Teaching and Learning

3.4 pts

Level 3

4-5 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from practice are relevant and support the statements.

3 pts

Level 2

2-3 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from practice are relevant and support the statements.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Less than 2 take-aways are included. The description is vague. The examples from practice are missing or do not support the statements.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGoals for future practice

3.4 pts

Level 3

The goals for the future practice are included. The new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified.

3 pts

Level 2

The goals for the future practice are included. The new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified but are unclear.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Either goals for the future practice or new areas for learning are not included.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Citations & References

3.4 pts

Level 3

All citations (5 or more) and references follow APA style.

3 pts

Level 2

Most (2-4) citations and/or references (3) follow APA style.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Either APA style is inconsistent, or references doesn’t follow APA style. Fewer than 2 citations are included.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Mechanics

3.4 pts

Level 3

Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors.

3 pts

Level 2

Assignment contains 3 – 5 errors.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Assignment contains 6 or more errors.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness

3.4 pts

Level 3

Paper posted on time

3 pts

Level 2

Paper is posted one day late

2.6 pts

Level 1

Paper is posted two days late

3.4 pts

Total Points: 17

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions