essaystudyhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

FINAL PROJECT/Essay questions: DebriefCIMA-0705 Today’s Educational Leaders


FINAL PROJECT/Essay questions: Debrief

CIMA-0705 Today’s Educational Leaders

For this final project/paper for this course, please write up a formal debrief from this course. We will use the reflective questioning model, “What, So what, and Now what?” This is a common debrief framework we use in healthcare simulation, and you may have encountered it before. Using the objectives of this course, for each main question compose an essay response with a minimum of 150 words each (Identifying, Understanding, Planning) of total of 450 minimum. Please use the following resources below to generate additional prompts, to respond in your own words. 

·
Identifying (What?) What did you gain from the course? 

·
Understanding (So what?) Why was this material important for your career? 

·
Planning (Now what?) What is your plan to implement any of the material we have covered? If you use specific examples, please be sure to cite using APA 7. 

 

View Rubric

Final Project

Final Project

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Relevance 20%

20 to >18 pts

Exceptional

Written response is relevant. The response to questions are excellent AND provide justification.

18 to >16 pts

Above Average

Written response is relevant. The responses to questions are above average.

16 to >13 pts

Average

Attempts to demonstrate relevance, yet the relevance is unclear to the reader.

13 to >0 pts

Below Average

Parts of the reflection are not made relevant.

/ 20 pts

Analysis 20%

20 to >18 pts

Exceptional

Moves beyond simple description of the experience to an analysis of how the experience contributed to student’s understanding of self, others, AND course concepts.

18 to >16 pts

Above Average

The reflection demonstrates student attempts to analyze the experience by addressing understanding of self, others, OR course concepts.

16 to >13 pts

Average

Attempts applying the learning experience to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but relies primarily on description of experience.

13 to >0 pts

Below Average

Reflection does not move beyond description of the learning experience(s).

/ 20 pts

Synthesis 25%

25 to >23 pts

Exceptional

The reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience.

23 to >21 pts

Above Average

Demonstrates connections between the experience and material or past experience.

21 to >17 pts

Average

Little to no attempt to demonstrate connections between the learning experience.

17 to >0 pts

Below Average

No attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience.

/ 25 pts

Reflection 25%

25 to >23 pts

Exceptional

Demonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, assumptions, preconceptions, AND defines new modes of thinking as a result.

23 to >21 pts

Above Average

Demonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, and preconceptions.

21 to >17 pts

Average

Some attempt at growth mindset thought patterns, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, etc.

17 to >0 pts

Below Average

No attempt at growth mindset thought patterns.

/ 25 pts

Clarity 10%

10 to >9 pts

Exceptional

Language is clear and expressive. Concepts are explained accurately. Explanation of concepts could make sense to an uninformed reader.

9 to >8 pts

Above Average

Minor, infrequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors that largely do not interfere with meaning.

8 to >6 pts

Average

There are frequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors may interfere with meaning.

6 to >0 pts

Below Average

Grammatical or mechanical errors result in confusion for reader. Concepts are either omitted or are presented inaccurately.

/ 10 pts

Total Points: 0

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions