Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s

Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not?

Initial Post (approx. 300 word)

  1. Evidence of critical thought
  2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
  3. Grammar, spelling and length 

Complete after reading the doc file I attached

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"