1Analyzing Healthcare IssuesYour NameCapella UniversityNHS4000: Developing a Healthcare PerspectiveInstructor NameMonth,

1

Analyzing Healthcare Issues

Your Name

Capella University

NHS4000: Developing a Healthcare Perspective

Instructor Name

Month, Year

2

Health disparities among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) remain a persistent

challenge in healthcare reflecting systemic inequalities that impact access, outcomes, and overall well-

being. This paper will explain this issue of health care disparities for low SES people, analyze the

contributing factors, compare potential solutions, discuss ethical considerations surrounding the

implementation of these solutions, and how solutions can benefit individuals with their chronic disease

management.

Health Disparities for Low SES People

Low SES individuals face a health disparity because of social determinants that extend beyond

the healthcare system. These determinants include income, education, employment, housing, and

access to healthcare resources (Jones, et al., 2022). Individuals with low SES often encounter barriers in

accessing quality healthcare services, leading to delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and poorer

health outcomes.

Factors contributing to health disparities include limited financial resources, lack of health

insurance, transportation challenges, and reduced health literacy (Garcia, et al., 2023). These individuals

may experience higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which can

be exacerbated by inadequate access to preventive care and health education (Jones, et al., 2022).

Analyzing Health Disparities for Low SES People

Studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with lower SES experience higher mortality

rates, increased prevalence of chronic diseases, and reduced life expectancy compared to their higher

SES counterparts (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The disparities due to lower SES can include limited financial

resources, transportation and technology which can limit their ability to attend needed appointments to

not only treat illness, but also provide preventative care. Individuals may want to attend needed

appointments and take their prescriptions as ordered but may lack the ability to do so because of

financial limitations.

3

Comparing and Contrasting Solutions

One solution is the expansion of community health clinics and mobile healthcare units to

enhance accessibility along with the use of telemedicine. These initiatives bring healthcare services

directly to underserved populations. This eliminates the individuals missing their appointments because

there is not adequate transportation.

Another strategy involves targeted public health education campaigns that raise awareness

about preventive measures, available resources, and the importance of regular health check-ups.

Increasing health literacy empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health and

navigate the healthcare system more effectively. The goal of this strategy is to make individuals aware of

the services available to them so they can improve their overall health and wellbeing.

To help individuals be able to afford healthcare services, healthcare providers can implement

financial assistance programs and sliding scale fees for low SES individuals (Smith & Johnson, 2021).

These initiatives aim to reduce financial barriers, ensuring that cost does not deter individuals from

seeking necessary medical care.

Ethical Principles in Implementing Solutions

The implementation of solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals must be

guided by ethical principles. The creation of mobile healthcare units follows the four ethical principles of

beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy and justice.

Beneficence requires interventions that actively promote the well-being of individuals, focusing

on improving access to healthcare, preventive services, and health education. Having a mobile unit

ensures low SES individuals will have access to care available to them. Nonmaleficence calls for the

avoidance of harm, emphasizing the importance of addressing the root causes of health disparities. The

4

mobile clinics address the issue of individuals not having transportation to attend needed healthcare

visits.

Respecting autonomy involves recognizing low SES individuals in their healthcare decisions. The

mobile healthcare units allow the individual to decide to seek treatment and give them the option to

attend appointments they may not have been able to because of limited transportation.

Justice is a fundamental ethical principle that underscores the need for fair and equitable distribution of

healthcare resources. The utilization of a mobile healthcare clinic helps those in need to be able to seek

out and obtain healthcare when needed, promoting equal access to quality healthcare for all.

Solutions and Chronic Disease Management

The proposed solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals have direct

implications for chronic disease management. Community-based interventions and increased access to

healthcare services enhance the continuum of care for individuals with chronic conditions.

Providing a mobile healthcare clinic is beneficial for chronic disease management among low SES

populations. The mobile clinic provides a convenient and accessible means for individuals to consult

healthcare professionals, monitor their conditions, and receive timely advice, especially in areas with

limited healthcare infrastructure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing health disparities for low SES individuals is a complex process that

requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, thoughtful analysis, and ethical

considerations in the implementation of solutions. The creation and use of a mobile clinic can help

bridge the gap in healthcare access and promote preventive care while upholding ethical principles. A

mobile clinic creates a location that benefits all individuals, particularly those facing chronic diseases in

low SES communities.

5

References

Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health

outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125.

Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the Gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal

of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions